top of page
Search

"But It's Fair Use!" — The Most Misunderstood Excuse in Advertising

  • Writer: Marc Morgenstern
    Marc Morgenstern
  • 5 days ago
  • 3 min read

At this point, I need to tell you that I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice.


Whenever a company gets caught using someone else's creative work without permission, they almost always have the same response?

"Relax. It's fair use."

They say it like the two words magically make everything okay. GUESS WHAT, they don't.

I want to clear up one of the biggest misconceptions I see in the creative world, because "fair use" has become the legal version of "my friend said it was okay." And that's getting a lot of people in trouble. 


So... what is fair use?

Fair use is a very limited exception in copyright law.  It allows certain uses of copyrighted material without permission but only under very specific circumstances. When courts look at whether something is actually fair use, they don't ask one simple yes-or-no question. They weigh several different factors like:

  • Why was the work used?

  • Was it educational or commercial?

  • How much of the original work was taken?

And probably most importantly... did that use hurt the market for the original creator?


Here's the part people miss: Fair use is not something you get to declare yourself.

It's a legal defense that gets evaluated after someone has already challenged you.

It isn't a permission slip.

 

Now let's talk about advertising.

This is where I hear the phrase "fair use" thrown around the most. A business grabs an image... Uses a movie character... Turns artwork into a meme... And posts it on social media... They say, "It's marketing. That's fair use."


Actually, Commercial advertising is one of the weakest places to make that argument.

If you're using someone else's work to sell a product,  promote your business,  drive traffic, or increase sales, guess what!  You're using that work commercially.


And courts generally view that very differently than someone using material for education, commentary - like a documentary, or criticism like a movie review. 

If the copyrighted work is what grabs your attention in the ad - that's probably not fair use. 


Another thing that gets confused all the time with fair use, is parody.

People think if something is funny, or a meme, or a joke, then it's parody.

Well, Not necessarily. Real parody comments on—or criticizes—the original work. 

Advertising “usually” isn't doing that. It's using the OC to get people to notice your product. That's a huge difference. If people recognize Spider-Man, Star Wars, or another famous image and it’s that recognition that you’re using to sell your business - that's called promotion, not parody. Then of course my personal favorite is - "But everybody does it."

"That's just how memes work."

Here's the thing. Lots of people speeding doesn't change the speed limit. And lots of people infringing someone’s copyright doesn't suddenly make that infringement legal.

It just means a lot of people haven't been challenged yet. Popularity isn't a legal defense.


Here's the reality.

Claiming fair use doesn't stop someone from suing you. It doesn't stop takedown notices. and It certainly doesn't stop getting your reputation damaged. In fact, what usually happens? The company will probably get called out and suddenly the post quietly disappears.


If you, the company’s first reaction is deleting the content that's usually a pretty good sign your fair use argument wasn't as strong as you thought.


So here's the big takeaway. Fair use is real. It's important. But it's also incredibly narrow, highly contextual, and decided by the courts. Not marketers thinking they’re clever. 


Hey, If your marketing strategy depends on hoping your lawyer can argue fair use later that's not a strategy. That’s begging for forgiveness instead of asking for permission.

It's a gamble. But one creators shouldn't have to pay for. 



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page